Research · February 2026

Your organization generates millions of signals every week. You're reading almost none of them.

The intelligence gap between what CHROs need to know and what they actually know is widening. In the AI era, that gap has become existential.

Organizational bureaucracy doesn't just slow decisions — it hides risk. The layers that were designed for governance now obscure the signals that matter most: who's disengaging, who's being underutilized, and where dysfunction is compounding unchecked. The intelligence problem isn't that the signals don't exist. It's that the structure of most organizations makes them invisible.

The $1.8 trillion blind spot

Every year, $1.8 trillion in productivity is lost to voluntary turnover in the US alone. Not because organizations lack data — they're drowning in it. Because they lack intelligence. The ability to understand what their people are actually experiencing before it becomes a resignation letter.

$1.8T

lost to voluntary turnover annually — most of it preventable

42% of that turnover is preventable. Employees told Gallup their managers could have changed the outcome. They saw it coming. Leadership didn't.

This isn't an HR problem. This is an enterprise intelligence failure. You wouldn't run finance without a P&L. You wouldn't run sales without a pipeline. Yet most organizations run their most expensive asset — their people — on annual surveys and gut instinct.

The CHRO's impossible mandate

Gartner's 2026 survey of 426 CHROs reveals the tension: you're expected to harness AI, reshape work for human-machine collaboration, mobilize leaders for growth, and embed culture into systems — all simultaneously. The board wants measurable outcomes within 12 months while you prepare the organization for the next three years.

Meanwhile, employee engagement has fallen to a 10-year low. Only 44% of employees know what's expected of them at work — down from 55% in 2019. The post-pandemic experiment hasn't stabilized. It's still accelerating.

And here's what no one says out loud: toxic culture is 10x more predictive of resignation than compensation (MIT Sloan Management Review). You can't solve a culture crisis with a retention bonus. You need to see it first.

10×

toxic culture is more predictive of resignation than compensation

Now layer in a new dynamic: "AI washing" — using automation announcements as cover for headcount cuts — is eroding the trust contract between employers and employees. When employees can't tell whether AI investment signals growth or a prelude to restructuring, engagement collapses before any announcement is made. CROs and CHROs need to see whether their organization's AI narrative is building confidence or accelerating flight risk. That distinction doesn't show up in any survey. It shows up in behavioral signals — and only if you're measuring them.

Why traditional analytics fail CHROs

65% of organizations now use AI and analytics. Yet only 53% of decisions are actually influenced by that data. The problem isn't access. The problem is that traditional people analytics measures the wrong things.

Annual engagement surveys tell you how people felt three months ago. Exit interviews tell you why someone left after they've already left. Performance reviews measure output, not the human dynamics that drive it. Leaders detect burnout through performance decline, mood changes, and workplace coping issues — but these are late-stage indicators. By the time they're visible, the damage is done.

75% of careers are derailed for reasons related to emotional competencies (Center for Creative Leadership) that never appear in any dashboard. Employees experiencing toxic behavior are 8x more likely to experience burnout symptoms (McKinsey Health Institute, 15,000-employee study across 15 countries). These are clear signals. They're just not being systematically captured.

The economic case for organizational intelligence

The numbers are unambiguous. With 82% of employees at risk of burnout and global disengagement costing $438 billion annually in lost productivity, early intervention isn't a nice-to-have. It's an economic imperative.

Replacing a senior leader costs 200% of their annual salary. A technical professional, 80%. For a 10,000-person organization with 13.5% annual turnover, that's hundreds of millions in preventable loss — before accounting for institutional knowledge, team disruption, and the cascading effect on remaining employees.

The displacement pattern has shifted. AI isn't just automating low-skill tasks — it's reshaping senior technical and strategic roles (WEF Future of Jobs, 2025). Flight risk is no longer an entry-level problem. Your most expensive, hardest-to-replace people are now the most likely to reassess. That changes the ROI calculus on retention intelligence entirely.

Every unit increase in emotional exhaustion drives a 12% increase in turnover. That's an exponential cost curve. The earlier you intervene, the more dramatically you reduce the financial exposure. Organizations using predictive emotional intelligence aren't just retaining people — they're recovering 5-15% productivity gains by addressing friction before it compounds.

71% of voluntary turnover stems from poor management. Not poor compensation. Not poor benefits. Poor management — which is fundamentally an intelligence problem. Managers who can see the signals act on them. The rest are guessing.

What Talent& actually does

Talent& adds an intelligence layer to your existing enterprise data. We connect to your Microsoft 365 tenant, your HRIS, and your AI agent infrastructure — no data transfer, no third-party storage, no privacy paradox — and transform scattered behavioral signals into organizational clarity.

Flight Risk Intelligence identifies who is likely to leave within 90 days, what it will cost you, and which interventions have the highest probability of changing the outcome. Not a guess. A prediction built on behavioral patterns — collaboration shifts, communication sentiment changes, meeting dynamics, engagement trajectories.

Hidden Talent Discovery surfaces the high-performers your org chart can't see. The people whose performance trajectory, cross-functional influence, and succession readiness make them disproportionately valuable — but who never surface in traditional review cycles.

AI Agent Ownership maps which employees own which AI agents — and what's at risk when they leave. When a senior engineer departs, their AI infrastructure doesn't disappear. It becomes an orphaned cost center. Talent& is the only platform that connects human departure risk directly to AI infrastructure exposure.

This is what Gartner's 2026 Future of Work trends point toward: the organizations that win won't just deploy AI for efficiency. They'll deploy it for understanding. The CHRO who can see the organization clearly — who can quantify culture, predict departures, and surface hidden talent — operates at a fundamentally different level than the one relying on quarterly surveys.

AI agents are your newest employees. Who's managing them?

2026 is the year AI agents went from concept to colleague. Autonomous systems now handle research, scheduling, code review, customer outreach, and decision support across every function. The workforce isn't just human anymore — it's a hybrid of people and AI agents working in parallel.

Enterprise teams now deploy a median of 14 different AI models simultaneously (a16z, 2026). The human-AI collaboration surface area isn't one tool — it's an ecosystem. Understanding how your people navigate that complexity, who owns what, and what breaks when someone leaves, is the new management challenge.

This changes the CHRO's mandate entirely. CHROs must now prepare for multiple human-AI work scenarios — from humans filling gaps left by AI to workers navigating entirely new spaces of innovation that AI enables. But here's the problem nobody's solved: as AI agents handle more operational work, the human dynamics become simultaneously more important and harder to see. When an AI agent handles the analysis, the human's value shifts to judgment, creativity, and collaboration. How do you measure that? How do you see when it's breaking down?

Talent& is built for this exact moment. Think of it as the intelligence layer for leadership — an always-on system that continuously monitors both the human side of your workforce and the AI infrastructure they own. While other AI agents optimize tasks, Talent& optimizes the organization itself. It sees the collaboration patterns between humans and AI-augmented teams. It detects when AI adoption is creating friction or accelerating flight risk. It surfaces the leaders who are thriving in the agentic era and the teams that are quietly struggling.

The most successful organizations in 2026 aren't just deploying AI agents across functions. They're deploying an intelligence layer at the leadership level — one that gives the C-suite the same real-time, predictive understanding of their people that they've always had for their financials. Talent& is that layer.

The AI era demands a new kind of CHRO

We're in the middle of the largest workforce transformation since the industrial revolution. AI is reshaping every role, every team, every org structure. The organizations that win won't just deploy AI for efficiency — they'll deploy it for understanding.

Gartner's nine future-of-work trends for 2026 make it clear: the most successful organizations will prioritize finding process experts — employees whose creativity and systems thinking allow them to redesign entire workflows, not just optimize individual tasks. That requires knowing who those people are. Traditional performance reviews can't tell you. Terminal can.

This is the shift: from HR as a service function to the CHRO as the organization's chief intelligence officer. The executive who doesn't just manage talent — but who understands, predicts, and shapes how the entire human system operates. The one who walks into the board room not with survey summaries, but with predictive intelligence that quantifies culture, forecasts departures, and surfaces the hidden talent that drives disproportionate value.

Talent& exists to make that possible. We don't replace your judgment. We give you the intelligence to make it precise.

The research.

The Signal Failure — Leaders Discovering Problems Too Late

42% of employee turnover is preventable: Gallup found that employees report their manager could have prevented their resignation — if they had seen the signals and acted.

Toxic culture is 10x more predictive of resignation than compensation (McKinsey). Yet most retention strategies still lead with comp adjustments and ignore the cultural patterns driving attrition.

71% of voluntary turnover stems from poor management — not compensation, not benefits. Organizations without systematic intelligence tools leave managers to interpret emotional signals on instinct alone.

The Reactive Leadership Gap — Late-Stage Indicators

Leaders detect burnout through performance decline, mood changes, and workplace coping issues — but these are late-stage indicators that appear only after significant damage to engagement and productivity.

Employee engagement fell to a 10-year low by 2024, with only 44% knowing what's expected of them at work — a structural clarity crisis that no annual survey can fix in real-time.

12% increase in turnover for each unit increase in emotional exhaustion — an exponential cost curve that makes early detection the single highest-ROI intervention available to CHROs.

The Intelligence Deficit — Data-Rich, Understanding-Poor

Only 53% of decisions are influenced by analytics despite widespread data availability (Gartner). The bottleneck isn't data collection — it's intelligence synthesis.

75% of careers are derailed for reasons related to emotional competencies (Center for Creative Leadership) (SAGE Journals) — yet most organizations lack any systematic measurement of emotional intelligence or cultural dynamics.

Employees experiencing toxic behavior are 8x more likely to have burnout symptoms — clear behavioral signals that exist in every organization's data but are invisible without the right intelligence layer.

Gartner's 2026 CHRO survey: organizations that embed culture into systems see up to a 34% increase in employee performance. The mechanism is intelligence — not intuition.

See your organization clearly.

30-minute setup. Your Microsoft tenant. Intelligence in days, not quarters.

Get Access

Sources